Television Review, Romance, Drama Everett Mansur Television Review, Romance, Drama Everett Mansur

Weekend Watch - Bridgerton Season 3

This latest season of Bridgerton continues to shine in the ways we’ve come to expect, if not quite so brightly in its story department, and it’s held up still by its leading ladies and a phenomenal production team.

                Welcome back to the Weekend Watch where each week we take a look at a new piece of film or television media and give it a rating, review, and recommendation. This week’s topic, as voted by the blog’s Instagram followers, is the latest season of Netflix’s hit period romance series Bridgerton, which released the second half of its third season last week. The show, produced by television legend Shonda Rhimes (Grey’s Anatomy, Scandal, How to Get Away with Murder), and created by her collaborator Chris Van Dusen, is based on the historical romance novels by Julia Quinn, which follow the romantic intrigues of the titular noble family and their compatriots in early 19th-century British high society. This season primarily adapts the novel Romancing Mister Bridgerton, which follows the romance between Colin Bridgerton (Luke Newton) and Penelope Featherington (Nicola Coughlan), although it implements elements from some of the other novels as well. This season sees the return of most characters and actors from the first two seasons (absent still Regé-Jean Page’s Duke Simon Bassett and Phoebe Dynevor’s Daphne Bassett) while also introducing Hannah Dodd as the previously absent Francesca Bridgerton, Victor Alli as Lord John Stirling, Daniel Frances as Lord Marcus Anderson, and Hannah New as Lady Tilley Arnold. Now that the full third season is out, plenty of people have started sharing their thoughts on it, so let’s get into it.

Letter Grade: B+; where the first two seasons shone in their central romances, the third draws more on its supporting cast, which may or may not work as well for everyone.

Should you Watch This Show? If you’ve been a fan of the show from the start, this’ll continue to scratch that itch, and if you weren’t, it’s not going to do any changing of your mind.

Why?

                Bridgerton Season 3 continues in so much of what has made the show such a success – steamy romance, gripping drama, complex love stories, the Vitamin String Quartet, involved sets, beautiful costumes, and memorable characters who grow more complex with each iteration. It knows its identity and niche in the market and delivers yet again a hit for that broad subset of the streaming viewers. Unfortunately, it feels like a show whose writing is starting to get away from it, much as so many of the Shondaland shows do. Season 1 gave us a fascinatingly convoluted romance with critiques on society, gender roles, and even conceptions of marriage and nobility. Season 2 offered a subversive romance that also served as a redemption arc for a previously debauched romantic lead that somehow got us to sympathize with the fact that people actually can change. Season 3’s central romance tackles a much safer, more tried-and-true route of friends to lovers to enemies to lovers again, which tackles fewer social issues, though its subplots do feature some refreshing takes on how love looks different for different people, learning to forgive, and the self-sacrificial elements of family. It’s still a strong season of the show, but certain aspects of it feel less satisfying than in seasons past.

                In addition to the excellent production design, the performances remain strong with Nicola Coughlan, Claudia Jessie, and Golda Rosheuvel remaining the standouts. While the rest of the cast continues to fill their roles admirably, looking and sounding the parts that they are asked to play, these three women continue to grow their roles and inhabit their characters in ways that keep them iconic in every iteration. Rosheuvel’s portrayal of Queen Charlotte has become so iconic that it earned the character a spin-off prequel series, and she continues to be a dominating force who steals the screen not just with her wild hairdos but her gravitas and expressions in every one of her scenes. It’s a performance that easily becomes career-defining because of how memorable she has become. Jessie plays the second Bridgerton daughter, Eloise, who defies societal pressures as much as possible and had been Penelope’s best friend up until some drama at the end of the second season, and that break allows her to grow Eloise in new directions this season, showcasing her capability for repartee and satire on a new level than ever before without losing the sense of self and vulnerability that have made her such a lovable character. Coughlan also shines in her increased role this season; obviously, her comedic capabilities have never been in doubt if you’ve ever seen Derry Girls, but she brings a sensuality and authenticity to her romance this season that helps to sell the plot and keep the audience invested even when the writing is doing her story few favors. She is the moment, and she won’t soon let you forget it.

                Where the acting and production value remains at peak levels, the writing in this season has fallen off as the story begins to lose itself too often in the weeds, taking wind out of the central romance’s sails to puff it into a side romance for Francesca that seeks to set up what I assume will be one of Season 4’s two main plots (it’s a good romance, but it detracts from the main story unquestionably). It also spends a lot of time looking at the sudden entrance of the Mondriches into high society from their humble beginnings without actually offering much in the way of story for them besides feeling occasionally out of place. Cressida Cowper (Jessica Madsen) is given an entire character arc this season, but it feels so aggressively two-toned that I wouldn’t be surprised if they rewrote her whole character between the two parts of the season (maybe if I had watched the two parts farther removed, I wouldn’t have noticed the inexplicable shift in her character from part one to part two). Even the drama of Whistledown and her secret identity, which is inextricably tied to the romance of this season, doesn’t really hold your attention like it did in the first two seasons because of the increasing number of people who already know the secret. Really, I was satisfied with the story but never blown away by anything groundbreaking or soul-shattering like I was with the first two seasons, but the open plots that remain for Season 4 to explore leave me hopeful that we’ll get back to that success quickly.

                This latest season of Bridgerton continues to shine in the ways we’ve come to expect, if not quite so brightly in its story department, and it’s held up still by its leading ladies and a phenomenal production team. With the full season now streaming on Netflix, I’d recommend any who’ve been holding out after enjoying the first two seasons to go watch this one as well. If you’re someone who hasn’t watched the show yet, Season 3 is not the place to start, but I highly recommend the first two seasons as well, and if you’re someone who gave the first season a try but found it wasn’t for you, I can’t say that this one will suddenly change your mind. Figure out which of those categories you belong in, and then go and do what you want.

Read More
New Movie, Recap, September Everett Mansur New Movie, Recap, September Everett Mansur

Weekend Watch - September 2022 Recap

In terms of quality, September was a mild step up from the summer months, even if its box office returns were quite weak (the lowest September in almost 30 years, excluding 2020, was what I saw).

                Welcome back to the Weekend Watch where each week we take a look at a new piece of film or television media and give it a review and recommendation. This weekend, we have come to the end of another month, and it’s time to recap all the movies worth watching that released this month, categorized by their likelihood of making it onto the blog’s list of Greatest Films of All Time. In terms of quality, September was a mild step up from the summer months, even if its box office returns were quite weak (the lowest September in almost 30 years, excluding 2020, was what I saw). There is one film worthy of the Sure Things categorization (though I might still be wrong), a few in the Possible Things, and a number in the Long Shots. Let’s take a look.

Long Shots:

God’s Country: Thandiwe Newton stars in this indie thriller that originally released at Sundance earlier this year before its limited theatrical release this past month. Critics seem to like this film slightly more than audiences, and it hasn’t drummed up a ton of buzz on any awards radars, but her acting chops and an 89% on Rotten Tomatoes keep this one on the edge.

Mija: Disney’s documentary about the children of undocumented immigrants working to make it in the American music industry has flown under the radar. So far, though, it has garnered positive responses from the few people who have seen it. It’s nature as a streaming documentary keeps it as a long shot, despite its decently high Rotten Tomatoes score, Metacritic score, and IMDB rating.

Riotsville, U.S.A.: This documentary about the militarization of America’s police force at the end of the 1960s finally received a limited theatrical release this month. Its divisive subject matter, critiquing the overt aggression of American police is bound to keep its fan reviews mixed, but its critic ratings are high, and it could garner some awards attention in the coming months.

A Jazzman’s Blues: Tyler Perry’s latest film, a period piece about an unsolved murder and the lives of black and white families in the early 1900s, has received surprisingly positive reviews, given his recent track record. The Netflix release probably won’t garner much more than this, but it’s still worth noting.

Blonde: Andrew Dominik’s fictional Marilyn Monroe biopic dropped this past week, and it has been divisive to say the least. Dominik’s vision seems to have come through strongly, but critics and audiences alike are divided on whether his vision is a good one. The one thing people can agree on is Ana de Armas’s strong performance, which keeps this film’s hopes alive but just barely.

Confess, Fletch: This soft reboot of the “Fletch” franchise, which was made famous by Chevy Chase, seems to be doing well enough with audiences and critics to warrant mentioning. Jon Hamm’s comedic chops are on full display, and it keeps this film a long shot.

Do Revenge: Netflix’s gen-z high school revenge comedy has been a surprise hit among certain audiences. Its teen-centric nature leaves it less than popular among “the olds”, but its success among younger viewers keeps it worth mentioning. Maya Hawke and Camila Mendes put on really fun performances in this one.

Don’t Worry Darling: The off-screen antics of this one are obviously the big draw for Olivia Wilde’s new film. Its just-okay script has kept the film from getting better reviews. Florence Pugh’s strong acting carries this film and keeps it worth mentioning here as a long shot.

Smile: This gruesome horror film about a doctor haunted by a smile released this week to comparatively positive reviews for a movie in that genre. I don’t see it going much farther than its 74% Tomatometer score and 82% audience rating, but it seems like a solid hit for fans of the genre.

Possible Things:

Barbarian: I already talked at length about this one in a previous Weekend Watch but suffice it to say that this wild horror film was such a pleasant surprise that it has worked its way into a possible Greatest Film of All Time. Solid performances, interesting horror, and surprises throughout have made this film the surprise hit of September.

Pearl: Not to be outdone, the prequel to Ti West’s X from earlier this year has been another solid outing in the horror genre from September. Mia Goth’s performance has critics and audiences buzzing, and the film even garnered a personal shoutout and high praise from the Martin Scorsese, one of the greatest directors to ever do it. Combined with high critic and audience scores across the board, it’s easy to see this one’s potential to make it on the list.

The Woman King: Apart from some review bombing on IMDB (a consistent problem for films featuring women, minorities, and members of the LGBT community in recent history that they need to fix ASAP), Viola Davis’s action film about the female warriors of the Dahomey has received consistent praise, covering its historical fiction well. The plethora of woman-led films releasing this year will most likely keep Davis out of any awards races, but her name recognition might launch this film even higher.

Argentina, 1985: This Spanish language film that released on Amazon Prime Video this past week has only been watched by a few viewers so far, but their responses have been overwhelmingly positive. The 95% (uncertified) Tomatometer score and 100% (with fewer than 50 ratings) audience score show that this is a film worth keeping an eye on moving forward, covering the prosecution of Argentina’s fascist regime in the 1980s (a topical hit).

Bros: The first romantic comedy from a major film studio to center around a gay couple has released, and so far, the reviews are positive. Billy Eichner is already generating buzz from the Golden Globes, and the film could even receive some nominations for its writing. This groundbreaking film is definitely one to keep an eye on going forward.

Sure Things:

Moonage Daydream: This cinematic experience of a documentary about David Bowie’s creative and musical journey has wowed audiences consistently since its original release at Cannes earlier this year and more recently in its theatrical and IMAX release this past month. The documentary is sanctioned by the Bowie estate and showcases some amazing visuals alongside a fascinating look at the iconic musical artist. Already, its scores are high enough to put it on this list, and the potential for more awards love going forward means that everything is looking up for this particular documentary.

Read More
New Show, Fantasy, Horror Everett Mansur New Show, Fantasy, Horror Everett Mansur

Weekend Watch - The Sandman

The first season of The Sandman is a mixed bag of great worldbuilding, inconsistent storytelling, and acting that is all over the board.

                Welcome back to the Weekend Watch, where each week we take a look at a new piece of film or television media and give you a review and recommendation for watching it. This week, the subject is Netflix’s latest horror series: The Sandman, based on the graphic novel by Neil Gaiman. It features Tom Sturridge as the titular “Sandman” or “Morpheus” or “Dream” and also Boyd Holbrook, Patton Oswalt’s voice, Vivienne Acheampong, Vanesu Samunyai, David Thewlis, and many others. It follows the story of the King of Dreams after he escapes one hundred years of imprisonment in the human world and seeks to set his realm and the things associated with it back to relative normalcy. Let’s get into it.

Letter Grade: B+, there’s a lot of potential here, but it still needs some work to be great

Should you Watch This Show? If you are at all a fan of the graphic novel, yes! If you are looking for a dark fantasy show with really good worldbuilding, then also yes. I don’t think this show is as universally watchable as some of Netflix’s other releases (read Stranger Things) though.

Why?

                Let’s start with some of what makes the show good. From what I can tell, fans of the graphic novel are highly pleased with most of what the show has done with the source material, which is always a good sign for adaptations (we’ll see how Amazon fares next month with their Rings of Power series). The aesthetic of the art comes through well in the visuals, which are mostly phenomenal to behold – some of the more intricate CGI leaves a little to be desired, but for a television show, the effects are pretty solid. The world of the novel also comes through well in the worldbuilding of the show. The many realms and mythical characters come into the story naturally and with adequate explanation, leaving very little confusion as to the role of each new character. The worldbuilding also leaves you wanting more by the end of the season – at least, it did for me, the sucker for good worldbuilding. Unfortunately, because of all of the characters and story arcs that are brought into the ten-episode season, the story sometimes gets left by the wayside and then caught up with later, rather quickly. The two main stories that feature in this season are deeply interesting in their own right, but because of the exposition that also has to occur, the stories both resolve rather quickly and conveniently with little payoff of things set up earlier in the show. At the same time, it feels like this show wants to set up for an adaptation of the entirety of The Sandman, the graphic novel, as many characters have now been introduced who have larger roles to play later on in the greater story, so that’s promising. (That does mean that we need even more watchers when season 2 drops in the future so that Netflix doesn't cancel it as they so often do. In addition to the solid worldbuilding and oddly paced storytelling, the shows acting is at times great and, at others, only so-so. Vanesu Samunyai, whose first credit is this show, puts forth a valiant effort as Rose Walker, the Dream Vortex and focus of the second half of this season, playing to the levels of the actors in her scene. When across from Tom Sturridge, Boyd Holbrook, and John Cameron Mitchell, she brings a very solid A-game, showcasing the emotional and emotive range of a far more experienced actress, holding her own and even upstaging these more seasoned actors. At the same time, in scenes with Razane Jammal’s Lyta or Eddie Karanja’s Jed, the show reverts to acting more on the level with a CW superhero show (still entertaining in a popcorn-y way, but definitely with more cheese). In addition to the performances of Sturridge, Holbrook, and Mitchell, the true highlights of the show come from David Thewlis as the villain of the first arc – the very creepily unhinged John Dee, whom he portrays with just the right amount of menace – and Kirby Howell-Baptiste and Vivienne Acheampong as the two positive mythical influences in Dream’s life – Death and Lucienne the librarian respectively. Death’s one episode in the middle of the season serves as a high point in both the acting and worldbuilding of the show, showcasing its potential, highlighted in Howell-Baptiste’s subtly emotional portrayal of the avatar of Death, who is apparently Dream’s favorite sibling and the one with the most influence over him. In similar fashion, Acheampong plays Lucienne, the librarian of the realm of Dream, and the closest thing Dream has to an advisor or a friend in his own realm. Her acting is consistent throughout the show, delivering a lot of exposition without ever feeling unnecessary and while having a legitimately involved character arc at the same time, developing alongside Dream. All told, the first season of The Sandman is a mixed bag of great worldbuilding, inconsistent storytelling, and acting that is all over the board. The show’s potential to get better makes it worth watching, along with its skillful adaptation of the original source material.

Read More